Tuesday February 19, 2019

Forward with Education & Reason

State News
LAB Investigation of State Corrections Needed PDF Print E-mail
Written by GBP Staff   
Wednesday, 09 March 2016 09:34

boy-in-docMedia reports last month revealed state officials at the highest levels have known for years of attacks and sexual assaults at Lincoln Hills School for Boys without either contacting or fully disclosing the details to concerned local officials or even the family members of the victims. This mistreatment of inmates and the underlying issues it reveals in DOC cause twelve legislators to request independent investigation by Legislative Audit Bureau.

Democratic Leaders Speak Out about Rebecca Bradley's Offensive Remarks PDF Print E-mail
Written by GBP Staff   
Tuesday, 08 March 2016 15:44

rebecca-bradley-walkerWisconsin's political landscape was rocked Monday morning by the bombshell revelation that Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote articles as a columnist for the Marquette Tribune mocking the LGBT community and those suffering from AIDS, describing them as "queers", "degenerates" and "murderers".

WisGOP Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Bradley's Hate Speech Revealed PDF Print E-mail
Written by Democratic Party of Wisconsin, Brandon Weathersby   
Tuesday, 08 March 2016 13:05

rebecca-bradleyMADISON - Wisconsin's political landscape was rocked yesterday by a Monday morning bombshell revealing hateful speech used by Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Bradley in articles she wrote as a columnist for the Marquette Tribune. In her writings, Bradley mocks the LGBT community and those suffering from AIDS, describing them as "queers", "degenerates" and "murderers". 

Here's a taste of how the news went over in Wisconsin: 

“Rebecca Bradley’s hateful writings are vile, demeaning, and unacceptable coming from anyone - let alone a Justice on our state’s highest court,” Democratic Party of Wisconsin Executive Director Kory Kozloski said on Tuesday. “Judges should be fair, impartial, and unbiased. Rebecca Bradley’s comments make it clear that Wisconsinites cannot expect to be treated fairly in her courtroom."

Even Bradley’s half-hearted apology fell short. In her response, Justice Bradley claimed that her comments “have nothing to do with the issues facing the voters of this state."

“The people of Wisconsin expect Supreme Court Justices who interpret the law fairly, and it’s clear they will never get that from Rebecca Bradley,” continued Kozloski. “Her hateful and prejudiced views have undermined the credibility of our state’s highest court, and she should step down immediately.”

New Information Confirms Great Lakes Water Unnecessary for Waukesha PDF Print E-mail
Written by Clean Wisconsin   
Tuesday, 08 March 2016 12:45

milwaukeeUpdated report reaffirms sustainable alternative for ample, clean drinking water now and into the future using a combination of shallow and deep groundwater wells for Waukesha.

WAUKESHA, WI  – New information confirms the City of Waukesha is able to sustainably provide its residents with ample, clean drinking water now and into the future using a combination of shallow and deep groundwater wells. Waukesha is the first to apply for Great Lakes water under a narrowly defined exception to the ban on diversions in the Great Lakes Compact, which was signed into federal law in 2008.

Last summer, the Compact Implementation Coalition (CIC), a group of local, state and regional environmental organizations, submitted a detailed analysis to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) outlining how Waukesha could meet its current and future water needs without taking water from Lake Michigan. The WDNR considered the Non-Diversion Solution (NDS) and asked the City of Waukesha to complete additional analysis regarding the sustainability of the deep groundwater aquifer.

"It was good to know the WDNR reviewed the Non-Diversion Solution, but it does not seem that they did so in earnest. Our intent in preparing the Non-Diversion Solution, was to provide the WDNR and the City of Waukesha with a foundation to begin a genuine analysis of its reasonable water supply alternatives which we do not believe they have done,” said Jennifer Bolger Breceda from Milwaukee Riverkeeper.  “Now, we're relying on the Regional Body and Compact Council to take a more comprehensive look at the Non-Diversion Solution and the viable alternatives Waukesha has."

The new report, written by GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc., provides new information on the cost and sustainability of treatment options, which directly answer the questions the WDNR asked regarding the initial analysis. This new information reaffirms that Waukesha does not need a Great Lakes diversion to meet its current needs. The CIC will submit this new information along with formal comments to the Regional Body and Compact Council.

The new information finds:

  • Instead of letting wells fail as a justification for requesting Great Lakes water, Waukesha should invest in the operation and maintenance of its current infrastructure and replace the well to regain its historic capacity. It's important to note that the underperformance of this well was not included in the city's original application, but included as supplemental material after the Wisconsin public comment period ended in August.
  • Waukesha should evaluate the treatment technology it's neighbors in Brookfield and Pewaukee use, which does not produce the same problematic radioactive waste or affect the total amount of water needing to be pumped from the deep aquifer. The treatment technology is adaptable and can be scaled to fit small and large systems, including Waukesha's. In Waukesha's case, the city could use the technology on six individual deep water wells in combination with their current treatment technology on one well. It's important to note that the only reason the CIC's NDS included the use of reverse osmosis is because this is the technology Waukesha included in its application as its preferred treatment alternative. Moreover, the challenges of disposing of the waste are surmountable engineering issues and technologically and economically viable options do exist.
  • Waukesha should evaluate the sustainability of deep aquifer use in the area by using Waukesha's actual historic water use to predict its future water use. Based on its past water use, Waukesha's future water use should continue to decline even with population growth and Waukesha’s planned conservation efforts, which could be expanded for even greater water savings. Evaluating the sustainability of the deep aquifer should be done with actual data, not unsubstantiated future water use.

"When an option so commonsense as replacing a well that is underperforming isn't considered part of a reasonable alternative, it's difficult to believe that the alternatives Waukesha evaluates in its application were considered in any sort of good-faith effort,” said Ezra Meyer from Clean Wisconsin. “At the very least, the Non-Diversion Solution should show the Regional Body and Compact Council that Waukesha has not demonstrated that it has exhausted all its alternatives to Great Lakes water as the Great Lakes Compact requires. But more than that, we believe the Non-Diversion Solution is a way forward, not just for the City of Waukesha, but for the region as a whole to conserve and protect our Great Lakes for future generations."

By adding appropriate treatment technology, investing in and properly maintaining its current infrastructure, and implementing responsible conservation measures, the City of Waukesha can sustainably supply its residents with clean drinking water using its existing groundwater sources. The Non-Diversion Solution continues to represent the most cost-effective and technically feasible alternative to meet the existing and future water supply demands for the City of Waukesha.

This new report can be found here, and the original Non-Diversion Solution can be found here.

<< Start < Prev 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 Next > End >>

Page 235 of 256
Copyright © 2019. Green Bay Progressive. Designed by Shape5.com